Media Analysis

Poof! One day in occupation causes young Jews on Zionist tour to question Zionism — ‘NYT’ reports

We are as critical of the New York Times as anyone, but we need to salute the superb report in the newspaper by David Halbfinger on a liberal Zionist trip for American Jews to see the occupation. Titled, “Touring the Israeli Occupation: Young U.S. Jews Get an Unflinching View,” the July 10 article offered horrifying glimpses of Palestinian conditions in Susiya and Hebron that left the young Jews staggered.

The article was about a very lukewarm tour of the occupation indeed, by the Zionist group J Street, which wants the visitors to engage in Israel advocacy back home, and wants to influence the more rightwing Jewish trips to Israel, notably Birthright, to stop off in Palestine.

But the thrust of the article was that one day’s exposure to the desolation of occupation caused two young Jews to question Zionism itself.

As the day grew long, the facial expressions more pained and the questions more anguished, the J Street tour seemed increasingly incompatible with Birthright’s goal of hooking young American Jews on Israel.

By dinnertime, two participants said they were reconsidering their belief in a Jewish state. Jesse Steshenko, 19, of Santa Cruz, Calif., who has a Star of David tattooed on his right wrist, said he was “disgusted” with Israel’s government.

“I came in here a very ardent Zionist,” he said. “You never know when a Holocaust might happen again. Yet, coming here, I’m starting to doubt whether a two-state solution is possible — and whether Zionism is even worth pursuing anymore.”

As for Liyah Foye, 19, a senior at UNC-Asheville: “what she saw on Sunday overwhelmed her: ‘My joy and my light shouldn’t be coming from someone else’s darkness,’ she said.”

Halbfinger chose a very Zionist Jewish lens for his tour, of course, and endeavored to undo some of his damage by suggesting the trip had “blindsided” the young Jews with the occupation. It goes without saying that the Times is very late to this story. Brief exposure to the Israeli occupation for both of us 13 years ago and more transformed our work as journalists. There’s nothing like seeing Jim Crow with your own two eyes. A friend who just returned from the Eyewitness Palestine trip to Palestine says that there was at least one middle-of-the-road American on the trip who left the country shaking his head over human rights abuses he’d never imagined to be so extreme.

But the reason that seeing Palestine up close comes as such a shock is that the media and leading pro-Israel organizations (including J Street) have done such an effective job of downplaying Israel’s occupation over the last several decades, even as Palestinians were trying to get out the news. The Times just “took a sharp left turn into territory where Birthright does not go,” as Halbfinger wrote of the tour. The article is getting angry pushback from pro-Israel groups.

His report represents a giant step forward, and a real sign of things to come. There’s no way to prettify apartheid, and as more Democrats and activist groups are looking at this issue openly, we should expect our leading papers and even broadcast media to begin to reflect the reality.

45 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Now that they have questioned their preferred brand of evil, one can only hope that the next step these young Americans take is to disavow it and perhaps even openly to oppose it.

North/Weiss- “But the thrust of the article was that one day’s exposure to the desolation of occupation caused two young Jews to question Zionism itself.”

Just two? How many in the group? 28? How many cheered? You guys feed your hopes and dreams on very thin gruel.

JESSE STESHENKO- “You never know when a Holocaust might happen again.”

Realistically, young Jews can’t be too careful. My God, if Corbyn becomes Britain’s PM can the cattle cars be far behind?

→ You never know when a Holocaust might happen again.

It is very unfortunate that Holocaust pimps have succeeded in getting Jews to harbour such fears. Of course we «never know» when another Holocaust may happen, just as we «never know» when any number of other improbable things may occur. But we can’t live our lives like Chicken Little. And the remote possibility of another Holocaust does not in any way justify the certainty of a comparable crime under the signboard of Zionism.

→ There’s nothing like seeing Jim Crow with your own two eyes.

The fiftieth anniversary of John Howard Griffin’s Black Like Me was commemorated in 2011 with the publication of a special edition. Griffin, who was white, turned his skin Black and travelled as a Black man through the southeastern US. His experiences opened the eyes of many white people to the reality of Jim Crow. Griffin suffered terribly for his efforts: he and his family had to flee to Mexico for many years, as they could not live safely in the US, and after returning he was beaten severely by the KKK.

The more humanist Jews understand who is the real victim in the situation, the shorter the duration of the occupation will be. As more Palestinians understand the imperative of demolishing the existing narrative, so assiduously cultivated, “Israel is the victim and has the right to defend itself”, the more allies they will accrue and the greater their political power.

Interesting – and accurate! – that J Street is described as a Zionist organization. Of course it is.